![mmpi-2-rf scale descriptions mmpi-2-rf scale descriptions](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/221883298_Minnesota_Multiphasic_Personality_Inventory-2_Revised_Form_Symptom_Validity_Scale-Revised_MMPI-2-RF_FBS-r_also_known_as_Fake_Bad_Scale_Psychometric_characteristics_in_a_nonlitigation_neuropsychologica/links/0f31753baaff40346c000000/largepreview.png)
Green, 2007) in separate forensic samples composed of disability claimants and criminal defendants. The present study extends the validation of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2 ( MMPI- 2) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2 Restructured Form ( MMPI- 2- RF) Response Bias Scale (RBS R. Wygant, Dustin B Sellbom, Martin Gervais, Roger O Ben-Porath, Yossef S Stafford, Kathleen P Freeman, David B Heilbronner, Robert L We discuss clinical implications and directions for further research.įurther validation of the MMPI- 2 and MMPI- 2- RF Response Bias Scale: findings from disability and criminal forensic settings. Our findings support the comparability of the scores of the 338-item version and the 567-item version of the 50 MMPI- 2- RF scales. We compared results with those previously reported by Tellegen and Ben-Porath (2008).
![mmpi-2-rf scale descriptions mmpi-2-rf scale descriptions](https://slideplayer.com/slide/10590498/36/images/12/MMPI-2-RF+Validity+Scales%3A+Development.jpg)
In this study, we evaluated the comparability of the MMPI- 2- RF scale scores derived from the original 567-item MMPI- 2 booklet with MMPI- 2- RF scale scores derived from the 338-item MMPI- 2- RF booklet in a Dutch student sample (N = 107). In most validity studies on the recently released 338-item MMPI- 2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) Restructured Form ( MMPI- 2- RF Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008 Tellegen & Ben-Porath, 2008), scale scores were derived from the 567-item MMPI- 2 booklet. Van der Heijden, P T Egger, J I M Derksen, J J L
#Mmpi 2 rf scale descriptions manual
Classification accuracy statistics confirmed the recommended cut scores in the MMPI- 2 RF manual (Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008).Ĭomparability of scores on the MMPI- 2- RF scales generated with the MMPI- 2 and MMPI- 2- RF booklets. No other validity scale added consistent incremental predictive utility to Infrequent Psychopathology Responses in distinguishing the simulation groups from the sample of patients. The MMPI- 2 RF validity scale Infrequent Psychopathology Responses best differentiated the simulation groups from the sample of patients, regardless of experimental condition. We used an analogue, experimental simulation in which MMPI- 2 RF responses (derived from archived MMPI- 2 protocols) of undergraduate students instructed to overreport psychopathology (in either a coached or noncoached condition) were compared with those of psychiatric inpatients who completed the MMPI- 2 under standardized instructions. This set of validity scales includes a newly developed scale and revised versions of the original MMPI- 2 validity scales. We examined the utility of the validity scales on the recently released Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2 Restructured Form ( MMPI- 2 RF Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008) to detect overreported psychopathology. Detection of overreported psychopathology with the MMPI- 2- RF validity scales.